A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Assemble Visible evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment within the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Specialist assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting equally the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must live together with one another prolonged after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.