A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has captivated national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, search for to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal preparing disputes, in which views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to gather visual proof from the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above Paul Feely and René Collier what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that each one performs have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that a lot of observers see as significantly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.